> If you really need to receive both addresses for some reason, the care-of
> address is the one that should be obtainable only via IPV6_RECVDSTOPTS.
> Logically, the IP layer in the correspondent host should swap the received
> home address and care-of address before passing the packet to an upper
> layer.
This sort of thing gives us security types hives..
Particularly when it comes to knowing which address is which, if, for
instance, rfc2401-style policy checks could conceivably happen either
before, or after, the swapping...
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with h... Markku Savela
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction wi... Erik Nordmark
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home addre... Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... itojun
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with h... Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with h... Erik Nordmark
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction wi... itojun
- rfc2292bis: outgoing interface... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with h... Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home addre... Erik Nordmark
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home addre... Francis Dupont
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home addre... Richard Draves
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home ... Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with h... Erik Nordmark
