>>>>> On Fri, 09 Jun 2000 09:09:18 +0200,
>>>>> AIme Le-Rouzic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In fact, the Home Address has to be also BEFORE the fragment header to
> allow firewalls to read it. Those firewalls
> can be on other destinations than those listed in the Routing Header.
> May be it needs to clarify to put a recommendation in RFC2460 or
> in the next RFC MobileIPv6 this special case.
Hmm, in any case, I hope the mobile IPv6 specification clarifies the
ordering as long as it dares to break the recommendation in RFC2460
(which is already a draft-standard RFC), before the spec proceeds to
an RFC status.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------