>> >The conclusion: sin6_flowinfo mbz in recvfrom(), and may contain
>> >only class bits in sendto(). It is much more convenient to make with
>> >setsockopt() or ancillary data.
>My take it also that accept() should behave the same as recvfrom,
>since a native application might take the address returned by accept() and
>use it in a subsequent connect() or sendto().
>But why do you think that you can only use the traffic class component
>in sendto()? (and connect() I assume)
>I don't see the need for that restriction.
just to clarify, the quoted portion was not my thinking, just a summary
of past discussion.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
