Pending any description of how this draft provides *any* technical benefit (for example, what situations it covers which cannot be accomplished for efficiently and effectively with the RFC2260-based proposal), I am strongly against this draft moving forward. Ben On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 09:16:09PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote: > Chairs, > > I stongly support this draft moving forward. > > regards, > /jim > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multiho... Bob Hinden
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Mul... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Mul... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming with... Jessica Yu
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming... Vijay Gill
- RE: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multiho... Paul Flores
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming with... Jessica Yu
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multiho... Jim Bound
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Mul... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6... Niels M�ller
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming with... Jessica Yu
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming... Jim Bound
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multiho... Ben Black
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Mul... Jim Bound
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6... Vijay Gill
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "... Jeff Williams
- Re: W.G. Last Call on &... Jim Bound
