Pending any description of how this draft provides *any*
technical benefit (for example, what situations it covers
which cannot be accomplished for efficiently and effectively
with the RFC2260-based proposal), I am strongly against
this draft moving forward.


Ben

On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 09:16:09PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote:
> Chairs,
> 
> I stongly support this draft moving forward.
> 
> regards,
> /jim
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to