Hello Francis,
I saw your note after I had already written my previous note.
> => of course current ND DAD doesn't work in this case but a management
> tool can easily fill the hole (for instance if we require nodes must
> register new addresses in a central (ie with the multiple link scope)
> database then it will be easy to detect duplicates. I'd like to use
> DHCPv6 for that (then I am *not* happy with the last I-D which makes
> this impossible, even this is not (yet) written down) but this function
> is easy to implement if the way interface IDs are built does not imply
> they are unique).
If you can contribute the necessary text to the DHCPv6 specification,
and if there is agreement that this problem needs to be fixed now,
then maybe that will make things different. Until then, I would
hope to avoid this delay. I don't see the easy solution.
Regards,
Charlie P.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
