> My reasoning is that ifindices are a link-layer id (per their original
> definition in MIB-II), whereas site ids are network-layer (and IPv6
> only)
> ids with a very different meaning.  It's a layer violation to ask for 
> uniqueness among them.

Dave,

You can have multiple logically separate name spaces of finite size and
all fit them into a single 32 bit ID space.
For instance, this can be done by making the 32 bit ID space identify
the name space using some small number of high order bits, and
leave the rest of the bits to each namespace.

As long as you don't have to support 4 billion interface IDs or site IDs
in a single box this shouldn't be a problem.

   Erik

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to