>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 01:07:19 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This issue may not be suitable for this list, but I kept ccing for
> the moment.
ditto...
>> Similar question: How about getifaddrs()?
>> The getifaddrs(NULL) included in KAME kit doesn't raise an error, does it?
> No.
Ummm...I might have misunderstood...did you really mean
getifaddrs(NULL) here, or did you mistype "getifaddrs" instead of
"freeifaddrs"?
If you really meant the getifaddrs(NULL) case, the current KAME's
implementation would raise the SEGV signal. However, again, it's just
a consequence of the fact that the function omits validation of the
argument.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
