Yes, that was one of the intents of RFC 2667.
-Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: shankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPv6 -over-IPv4 tunnel.
Hi folks,
cant we treat the IPv4 layer incase of IPv6/IPv4 nodes as a
tunnel interface, with the local, remote IPv4 addresses as the
tunnel configurations i.e. can we apply the new tunnel mib 2667
to this concept of tunneling.
here a tunnel interface will be created, and the IPv6 routing table will have
the IPv4 encap also as a interface.
does that sound ok ?
tia
shankar
-------------------------------------------------
Make webveda your permanent address like i have.
Get 15 MB Free space only at http://www.webveda.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
