>> the order of return value from getaddrinfo(3) has to be carefully
>> designed - in your case, I bet you need to return AF_INET6 first on
>> AI_PASSIVE getaddrinfo lookup.
>Yes, getaddrinfo() flagged AI_PASSIVE with PF_UNSPEC hints SHOULD return
>PF_INET6 before PF_INET. glibc is ok at this point.
"getaddrinfo(3) should sort replies so that it respects bind(2)
behavior". for Tim's case and linux's case, due to bind(2) behavior,
getaddrinfo(3) should return AF_INET6 entries first.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
