>
> > I don't think NAT should be made obsolete or unneeded after
> IPv6 has been
> > deployed, but rather to be offered for some purposes on small
> and home
> > networks.
>
I predict that the use of IPv6-IPv6 NAT will be widespread,
for the reason that most net admins will prefer NAT to renumbering.
(Noting here that site-local addresses doesn't eliminate
renumbering...you still will have to merge sites from time to
time.)
PF
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
