> I happen to think that ISPs will charge a premium for multiple and/or
stable
> v6 addresses because that is the status quo and because the market will
bear
> it. Thus, I suspect that NAT will remain quite active if/when IPv6 is
> deployed.
Maybe they wan't do that anymore when their competitors offer the same
service for free, and why wouldn't they? IPv6 addresses, as opposed to ipv4
addresses, are NOT a scarse resource!
So only one "FREE ISP" has to make the move.....
Saskia
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
