I would like to see a "IPv6 router requirements" on the charts.
Other important stuff is to define a MIB for mobileIPv6.
Rgz
-- Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 6:19 PM
> To: Thomas Narten; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Revised IPng Working Group Charter
>
>
> Thomas, Erik,
>
> Attached is the revised charter for the IPng working group.
> Updating the
> charter was agreed to at the Grenoble and Minneapolis working group
> meetings. This version has been discussed on the ipng
> mailing list and at
> the Adelaide IETF meeting.
>
> The charter includes changing the name of the working group
> to the "IP
> Version 6 Working Group", but will keep the acronym of
> "ipngwg". This will
> avoid having to rename all current internet drafts.
>
> Bob Hinden / Steve Deering
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>
> IP Version 6 Working Group (ipngwg) *** note: change of name
> but not acronym
>
> Chair(s):
>
> Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Steve Deering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Document Editor
>
> Bob Hinden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Internet Area Director(s):
>
> Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Internet Area Advisor:
>
> Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Mailing Lists:
>
> General Discussion:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In Body: in body: subscribe ipng
> Archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/mail-archive
>
> Description of Working Group:
>
> IP version 6 or IPv6 (also formerly known as IP Next
> Generation or IPng)
> is intended to support the continued growth of the
> Internet, both in
> size and capabilities, by offering a greatly increased IP
> address space
> and other enhancements over IPv4. The working group was
> originally
> chartered to implement the recommendations of the IPng
> Area Directors
> as outlined at the July 1994 IETF meeting and in "The
> Recommendation
> for the IP Next Generation Protocol," RFC1752, January
> 1995. Most of
> the tasks in that original charter have been completed,
> and the core
> IPv6 protocol specifications are now on the IETF standards track.
> The working group's ongoing responsibilities are as follows:
>
> - Complete work from the original charter and follow-on work, as
> outlined below.
>
> - Keep all IPv6 working group documents moving along
> publication /
> standardization track.
>
> - Serve as a review board and body of competence and
> coordination for
> IPv6 architectural issues that span multiple IETF
> working groups.
>
> - Provide a home for IPv6-related work that doesn't fit
> in an existing
> IETF working group and doesn't merit a working group
> of its own.
>
> - Provide technical input to ICANN, Internet Address
> Registries, and
> IANA with regard to IPv6 address allocation policies
> and procedures.
>
> - Provide technical input and review to IANA with regard to IPv6
> protocol and parameter assignments.
>
> The list of the working group's current work items is as follows:
>
> - Revise ICMPv6 spec (scope-exceeded err, no error to redirect,
> editorial)
> - Revise Generic Tunneling spec (add bidirectional tunnels)
> - Update Basic and Advanced API specs
> - Complete Scoped Address Architecture spec and any
> necessary revisions
> to other working group drafts required to properly
> implement support
> for IPv6 address scoping
> - Complete work on recommended address-selection algorithms
> - Work on new solutions to site-multihoming problems,
> possibly including
> both host-based and router-based solutions.
> - Complete work on local IPv6 networking as part of IPv6
> plug-and-play
> - Complete work on privacy extensions to stateless
> address configuration
> - Document IPv6 renumbering model
> - Complete the GSE Analysis document
> - Complete the Inverse Neighbor Discovery spec
> - Complete the IPv6 Node Information Queries spec
> - Complete MIB specs as required by any working group
> protocol specs
>
> New work items not listed above require the approval of
> the working
> group and Internet Area directors before they will be
> taken on by the
> working group.
>
> The working group would welcome contributions on the
> following topics
> (this is not an exhaustive list):
>
> - Flow label standardization
> - Solutions to other multihoming issues, beyond those specific to
> site-multihoming
> - Integration of autoconfiguration, mobility, DNS,
> service discovery
> and other technologies to enhance IPv6 plug-and-play
> - IPv6 dial-up issues relating to address assignment,
> use of Neighbor
> Discovery, etc. (not including AAA work)
> - Specifications for IPv6 over additional media
> - Extending MLD to include functionality of IGMPv3
> - Host use of anycast; TCP use of anycast
> - Support for multi-link subnets (single subnet spans
> multiple links)
> - Scope-name discovery
> - IPv6 protocol extensions to accommodate mobile
> wireless networks.
>
> Goals and Milestones:
>
> Aug 2000 Complete MLD MIB and submit for Proposed Standard
>
> Sep 2000 Complete privacy extensions specification and submit for
> Proposed Standard
>
> Nov 2000 Completed revision of GSE Analysis document and resubmit
> for Informational
>
> Sep 2000 Complete the Inverse Neighbor Discovery specification
> and submit for Proposed Standard
>
> Sep 2000 Complete IPv6 Multihoming with Route
> Aggregation and submit
> for Informational.
>
> Dec 2000 Update ICMP document and resubmit for Draft Standard
>
> Dec 2000 Update Generic Tunneling specification and resubmit for
> Proposed Standard
>
> Nov 2000 Complete updates to Basic and Advanced API
> specifications
> and submit for Informational
>
> Dec 2000 Complete Scoped Address Architecture and submit
> for Proposed
> Standard
>
> Dec 2000 Compete Address Selection specification and
> submit for Proposed
> Standard
>
> Dec 2000 Complete Local IPv6 Networking Specification
> and submit for
> Proposed Standard
>
> Dec 2000 Complete the IPv6 Node Information Queries specification
> and submit for Proposed Standard
>
> Mar 2001 Complete IPv6 renumbering model document and submit for
> Informational
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
