In your previous mail you wrote:
My recollection is that an implementation of 6over4 for some BSD flavor
exists, since I recall someone performing some interoperability testing
between our implementation and that implementation.
=> I did some interoperability testing at the interim meeting in Tokyo
using a 3Com multicast router (for fun!). I can remember details, only
it was very soon in the morning...
UCLA sounds familiar.
=> I got one day the CAIRN code but when I tried to port it to FreeBSD 3.x
I discovered I had only some parts then I kept only the name (virtual
Ethernet -> vet) which is in fact the (first/only) thing needed to implement
a new flavor of IPv6 over IPv4 (I have 4 different ones :-).
Aren't two interoperating implementations a requirement for Proposed
Standard? (RFC 2529 is at PS) I'm not aware of any others offhand, but it
wouldn't surprise me if there were some.
=> Cisco supported this but this was removed... Obviously 6to4 (a *different*
thing) is far more popular (for bad reasons IMHO).
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
