Erik, > > The spec is clearly incomplete in this area. > I do think we want this to work for unconnected datagram sockets i.e. 1 is > not an option. > > Does the implementors have any preferences between #2 and #3? > Doing #3 would require defining a data structure containing an MTU field > plus a socketaddr_in6. > I would prefer #3. tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- [advanced API] how to get the destination a... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Francis Dupont
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the ... Alain Ritoux
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Francis Dupont
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the ... Francis Dupont
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the ... Erik Nordmark
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: [advanced API] how to get the dest... Francis Dupont
