Robert Elz writes:
> That is, I think there needs to be a "blackhole" (or unreachable)
> preference as well as "bad" "average" "good" (or low medium high).
[...]
> So, I would suggest allocating that final code as "unreachable",
> with the interpretation by the host that after running the algorithm
> the route selected is unreachable, then packets should simply be
> discarded (with an appropriate error to the application).
I tend to agree with this, and we indeed talked about this
possibility a while back while Rich and Balash were working on
what should go in the draft.
-Dave
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
