> I have one more question about the option. What if the size of an
> outgoing packet is larger than the MTU of the outgoing interface on
> the sending node, when the application set the IPV6_RECVPATHMTU
> option? Should the kerenl pass the IPV6_PATHMTU ancillary data with
> the MTU of the outgoing interface?
My assumption was that it would send up an IPV6_PATHMTU and
also fragment and send the packet.
Erik
> (BTW, our current implementation does not pass the ancillary data on
> the sending node. In such a case, it just fragment the packet using
> the MTU of the outgoing interface.)
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
