Alex Conta wrote:
>
> The capture of the type of application is in fact the idea behind the
> IANA reserved/defined value of the "flow label type' in my "flow-label"
> related recent draft. The first bit of the redefined
> "flow label type" would indicate that it is a IANA number as opposed to
> a "protocol/server-port". This "reserved/IANA defined" value is a better
> indication than the "protocol/server-port".
I think that's debatable, but you need to debate it over in the Transport
and Management areas with all the QOS and QOS management experts. It's clearly
out of this WG's core competence to take that decision.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
