D. J. Bernstein writes ("The case against A6 and DNAME"):
> I recommend that the A6 and DNAME proposals be terminated. I've set up a
> web page on this topic:
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html
As I've stated before, I strongly agree. I asked here what the
purpose of A6 and DNAME are, and the end result has been that we're
told that they're a fancy macro scheme to save zone administrators
having to write trivial perl scripts.
Ian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Ignatios Souvatzis
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME David Harmelin
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME David Harmelin
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Ian Jackson
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Matt Crawford
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME Jim . Bound
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME Christian Huitema
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Bill Sommerfeld
- The cost of signing records D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Matt Crawford
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME Jim . Bound
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
