fwiw I agree with Erik. Radius is the deployed solution and we should
be glad that it will support IPv6. (Everything should support IPv6:-)
Brian
Erik Nordmark wrote:
>
> > The RADIUS and IPv6 document <draft-aboba-radius-ipv6-05.txt>
> > is in last call for proposed standard. I don't believe it is a good
> > thing to have some mods for IPv6 in Radius when we ask for a full
> > AAA for IPv6, ie. Radius for IPv6 can slow down the deployment of
> > IPv6 because it provides a transient solution... Of course this is
> > *not* a technical concern.
>
> I think the opposite is the case.
>
> Currently nobody can build an IPv6 PPP NAS since the Diameter protocol
> is nor specified neither implemented.
> Being able to build such a thing using Radius seems like a good thing
> instead of requiring that Diameter be finished before you can get
> dial-in IPv6 access.
>
> Erik
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
