In your previous mail you wrote:
I'd like to ask for some general consensus on the following questions:
1) Are "::10.1.1.1" and "::169.254.1.1" legal IPv6 addresses?
(They look like global IPv6 addresses, but aren't globally unique.)
RFC 2373 does not mention any such restriction, and so
implies "yes".
=> no
2) Similarly, is "2002:0A01:0101:..." a legal IPv6 address?
The current 6to4 draft implies "no".
=> no
3) Is it reasonable that the answers to the above two questions
could be different?
=> no
The argument is: even if these addresses seem legal in an internet
*NOT* connected to the Internet, IPv6 provides local scoped and
not ambiguous addresses which have none of RFC 1918 problems.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: what is your purpose? Add this in BCP filters?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
