At 12:25 AM -0800 3/6/01, alex r wrote:
>Is the following a valid configuration in IPv6. The
>addresses represented in as (L) are either all site
>local or all link local addresses
>
>
> A(L1)---------(L2)B(L1)----------(L2)C
>
>B is connected to two different links / sites. The
>addresses are unique within their respective scopes.
Yes, that is a valid configuration.
At 9:38 AM +0100 3/6/01, Alain Ritoux wrote:
>But I wonder if we can push as far as :
> A(L1)---------(L2)B(L2)----------(L1)C
> the assumptions being the same.
Yes, that one is valid too.
By the way, an updated version of the IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture
draft was submitted by the ID deadline and should appear in the ID
directories Any Day Now. It can also be fetched now from:
ftp://standards.nortelnetworks.com/ipv6/draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-02.txt
Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
