This would seem to fall under the ITRACE WG as far as I can tell.
Erik
>----- Begin Included Message -----<
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:25:56 +0900
From: "Masafumi OE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Flow Label discussion
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Could do you give me 10 minutes to talk and discuss about my IPv6
traceback idea?
This technique is routers mark own address and previous hop's address
that is divided on flow label.
Nodes can make paths from a lot of IPv6 packets with the flow label.
I guess this idea is effective for finding DDoS attacker using faked
source address.
Because I am a newcomer person, I leave the judgment whether to giving
valuable time for me to the chair.
As a judgment material, my proposal will be uploaded in webpage by Saturday.
Thank you.
--
Masafumi Oe, NAIST, WIDE, JAPAN.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0600,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> good idea. how about each person write short abstract and send to the list
> not more than two paragraphs and one is better? I for one may not be able
> to do that till end of week or on sunday night from hotel?
>
> thx
> /jim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Steve Deering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday,March 14,2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Erik Nordmark
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bob Hinden
> > Subject: Re: Flow Label discussion
> >
> >
> > At 12:09 PM +0100 3/14/01, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> > >Thus before the WG can actually make any decisions about flow label
> > >semantics I think we need to have folks write up the different
> > >problem statements for which they see the flow label as a
> > potential solution.
> > >Then the WG can decide which problem(s) are the most
> > important to solve
> > >and whether or not using the flow label is the best
> > solution. That would
> > >then hopefully lead to nailing down the semantics of the flow label.
> > >
> > >So having the discussion you propose is fine, but please
> > keep the problem
> > >statements in mind.
> >
> > Excellent point, Erik. Clearly, we don't have time for much
> > writing up
> > before the meeting, but those of you who wish to make presentations
> > should include a description of what problems you are trying to solve,
> > why those are essential problems to solve, and why using the IPv6 Flow
> > Label is the best or only way to solve them. It would be good if our
> > discussion helps to focus the problem space and the set of potential
> > solutions, so there will be fewer drafts that need to be written and
> > argued about afterwards. (Well, one can hope... :-)
> >
> > Steve
>----- End Included Message -----<
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
