David R. Conrad writes: > would be useful and could be made to work reliably if suitably constrained I don't believe you. Please say for the record exactly what constraints you have in mind, so that we can see whether the constrained mechanism is (1) reliable and (2) useful. ---Dan -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Bill Sommerfeld
- The cost of signing records D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Matt Crawford
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME Jim . Bound
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME Jim . Bound
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME JIM FLEMING
- RE: The case against A6 and DNAME David R. Conrad
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME David R. Conrad
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Robert Elz
- Re: The case against A6 and DNAME Niels M�ller
