Hello,
>we also don't need any specific definition of
>what is a site - all that can possibly do is to constrain thinking into
>the future.
As I also think we should not constrain concept of site. But I belive we
still need some minimun defenition of site, or need some example that show
such a set is site or not.
For example, how about it?
There is a company that has two sets of network in two place.
As each network is too far, this company get connectibity from
two ISPs( ISP1 has prefixes in TLA1, ISP2 has prefixes in TLA2).
And this company want to communicate this two network without
Grobal network, this company connect this two network with
released line. like this;
[TLA1] [TLA2]
| |
<NLA1-1>-----<NLA2-1>
( NLA1-1 is from TLA1, and NLA2-1 is from TLA2 )
then can we call a set of NLA1-1 and NLA2-1 is a site ?
I belive that this set is not a site but two sites.
but if we define site is whatever I want it to be,
then someone will regard this a set of two networks is a site.
----
Tomohide Nagashima
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
