On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:17:21AM -0600, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> That said, an RFC that discussed DoS avoidance strategies would be
> a good idea. I'm agnostic about whether that should be done in a
> WG or as an individual submission, but BCP status would be a good
> one to aim for. How this process should be organized is up to the
> AD's and the IESG. (Also note that the next rev of draft-rescorla-sec-cons
> has a good section on DoS attacks.)
For what it's worth, the following document could provide a starting point:
http://www.cert.org/reports/dsit_workshop-final.html
It provides some specific recommendations, but is too vague in some areas
and is, perhaps, a little out-of-date.
---
Robert Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Security Engineer, Arbor Networks, Inc.
www.arbor.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
