On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:56:14PM -0800, Bill Manning wrote:
> %
> % On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:59:54PM -0600, Matt Crawford wrote:
> % > You know what I'm going to liker about the shining all-v6 future?
> % > It's going to be rather difficult for the script kiddies to scan my
> % > entire address space looking for their favorite port.
> %
> % An unplanned deficit of IPv6: operating without DNS will be much, much
> % harder. (Particularly if you can't type ":" quickly)
> %
> % Niall
> % --
>
> or try the functional equivalent of dig -x 198.32.4.13, which
> with nibble support looks like:
>
> dig 6.a.7.4.7.7.e.f.f.f.0.2.0.0.a.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.0.8.0.e.f.f.3.ip6.int.
>
> (I think I am missing a "0" in there somewhere)
> bitstrings are even more "interesting".
Hexadecimal numeric keypads would help, preferably with a : key as well.
Using words like dead and beef might make addresses easier to remember.
Sorry, I couldn't resist
Stig
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
