> I don't know, but if this (i.e. a "black-hole" preference) is
> the only possibility, why don't you just define it in the
> (next revision of) the draft? It would ensure the best
> (future) interoperability.
Because defining and implementing it properly is complicated, and it's
not clear if it's worth the trouble.
Rich
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
