>In the case of link-local addresses, I think that the packet should
>only be forwarded once across the p2p link- when the hop limit goes
>below 255, it shouldn't get forwarded back?
unfortunately there's no such rule (as far as i know). if you find
any mention in RFC/draft, please let me know.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Alain Ritoux
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Robert Elz
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Robert Elz
- RE: nonexisting destination on p2p link Richard Draves
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link sowmini
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Ole Troan
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- RE: nonexisting destination on p2p link Richard Draves
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Robert Elz
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Robert Elz
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link itojun
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Robert Elz
- Re: nonexisting destination on p2p link Thomas Narten
