On Tue, 1 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> or, are you proposing this scenario?
> - routing table has ff02::%interface/64
> - routing daemon discovers each other
> - routing daemon installs Lb%interface/128 once they discover each
> other
> none of the existing routing daemons (i know of) work this way.
Have I missed something, or why does this have to be done in the routing
protocol? Can't some more generic, lower level method like NS/ND work
here?
More generic /128 route addition can of course be problematic if it's not
done right in the routing protocol. Imagine enabling a flawed version
this on a 1000-computer LAN segment and filling your routing table.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
