So your saying this happens with router-renumbering? It should not with
ND. ND should not alter a peer routers address. So still why is this an
ND problem. ND and Router Renumbering are two distinct but compatible
specs?
thanks trying to understand,
/jim
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Bill Manning wrote:
> %
> % Hi Bill,
> %
> % > % With all due respect IPv6 is far superior to IPv4 for renumbering.
> % > % Have you looked in depth at Neighbor Discovery, Stateless
> % > % Autoconfiguration, and Router Renumbering RFCs. Then put them all
> % > % together. Nothing I mean Nothing exists like this in IPv4.
> % >
> % > And it was hell to fix. Six routers sharing a broadcast domain.
> % > All running ND & all running RA. Which Address do the BGP peer
> % > on?
> % > The Fix? Turn off ND & RA and statically configure the interfaces.
> % >
> %
> % Why is BGP affected by ND and RAs. ND is not for Router-to-Router
> % communications?
> %
> % /jim
>
> BGP is bound between two IP addresses. When the IP addresses change
> the BGP peering is lost.
>
>
> --
> --bill
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
