hello all,
I have come across some confusion regarding pmtu discovery from ipv6 to ipv4
hosts. According to rfc 2765, when an ipv6 host sends a packet to an ipv4
host thru a translator, it performs pmtu discovery ...however if there is a
link on the ipv4 side which has a lesser mtu then a icmpv4 dest unreachable
message is sent which is translated to icmpv6 pkt too big message by the
translator and sent back to the ipv6 host...thus all goes well and pmtu
discovery works end-to-end. However, if there is a link on the ipv4 side
with pmtu < 1280 then the ipv6 host will be confused since it is guaranteed
1280 byte pmtu in any case. The IPV6 spec (rfc 2460) has a solution for this
too and it states that in such a case, the pmtu should not be decreased
beyond 1280 and be kept at 1280 but a frag header be added for every packet
sent to the ipv4 destination. But then it also makes a statement like this:
IPv6 requires that every link in the internet have an MTU of 1280
octets or greater. On any link that cannot convey a 1280-octet
packet in one piece, link-specific fragmentation and reassembly must
be provided at a layer below IPv6.
and for above mentioned scenario it says:
In response to an IPv6 packet that is sent to an IPv4 destination
(i.e., a packet that undergoes translation from IPv6 to IPv4), the
originating IPv6 node may receive an ICMP Packet Too Big message
reporting a Next-Hop MTU less than 1280. In that case, the IPv6 node
is not required to reduce the size of subsequent packets to less than
1280, but must include a Fragment header in those packets so that the
IPv6-to-IPv4 translating router can obtain a suitable Identification
value to use in resulting IPv4 fragments. Note that this means the
payload may have to be reduced to 1232 octets (1280 minus 40 for the
IPv6 header and 8 for the Fragment header), and smaller still if
additional extension headers are used.
My question is that how does one know when to add a frag header if pmtu
fails?? I guess pmtu discovery can fail due to two reasons:
1. Either there is a router on the ipv6 side which has not implemented pmtu
discovery (eg an embedded implementation) and it sends back a next hop mtu =
0.
2. There is a link on the v4 side that has pmtu < 1280 and it sends some
next hop mtu value < 1280
Do i need to add the frag header in both of these scenarios or just in the
case of scenario 2. And if it is only in the case of scenario 2, then how do
i distinguish it from scenario 1??
Also, rfc 2460 comments very little on what happens in case 1. Just:
It is strongly recommended that IPv6 nodes implement Path MTU
Discovery [RFC-1981], in order to discover and take advantage of path
MTUs greater than 1280 octets. However, a minimal IPv6
implementation (e.g., in a boot ROM) may simply restrict itself to
sending packets no larger than 1280 octets, and omit implementation
of Path MTU Discovery.
So, if there is one such router with no pmtu implementation which makes pmtu
discovery fail, then what does a ipv6 end host needs to do??
regards,
imran
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
