>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2001 09:18:25 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> which protocol do people want to test specifically?
>> i would like to test the following protocols with you guys:
>> - draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-00.txt
>> - draft-haberman-ipngwg-auto-prefix-00.txt
>> of course, i'm happy to do basic ND/TCP/whatever test as well.
> Our (KAME's) implementation can send RAs with Router Preferences and
> More-Specific Routes. But we don't have a host-side implementation,
> so I'd like to test if it works correctly with host implementations
> (probably with Windows one).
I'm also interested in differences about the bind(2) system call in
terms of IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (see attached). I'd be glad if we
can run the test on various implementation at the testing event.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, (sorry for cross-posting).
I'm now looking at how each IPv6 implementation is friendly with
bind9, especially on the bind(2) system call ordering issues.
As the first step, I'd like to collect differences among
implementations using some test scripts. So, if you have time, could
you spend some time to do the test on your system(s)?
The test tool is freely available at the following URL:
http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/kame/bindtest/
and the results so far at
http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20010504/
Here is a step by step instruction of the test:
- compile bindtest (see Makefile)
- run test.sh like this:
% sh test.sh myplatform.txt
- send myplatform.txt to me, with exact indication of OS name/version
number/build date/whatever
I hear that some systems have already supported a new IPv6 socket
option "IPV6_V6ONLY". I'm particularly interested in the results on
such systems (the latest test.sh contains some tests with the option).
We'll basically put the results on the URL above, so that everyone can
refer to it. If you can do tests but do not want to make the result
open, please explicitly say so when sending the result.
Thanks in advance,
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
