Ken,

I re-reviewed the questionable statement in MIPv6-13 and I think your point
was right. And now I think that sentence was quite perplexingly tricky,-
because there are two subjects for a predicate verb 'process' in one
sentence. The first half part in the sentence is saying the node's IPv6
encap/decap module processing, while the latter is saying the node's
transport layer processing -  trickily with two commas.

Sooo amusing! :>

Big thanks,

Jiwoong





----- Original Message -----
From: "Powell, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:16 PM
Subject: RE: [mobile-ip] MN's packet reception


> I disagree. The "as if" clause applies only to processing
> done "by upper-layer protocols within the mobile node", such
> as TCP and above. The processing described in [2] happens
> below TCP.
>
> Ken
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiwoong Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:06 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [mobile-ip] MN's packet reception
> >
> >
> > All
> >
> > In addtion to the original mail, I suggest to remove the last
> > subordinate
> > clause (*) starting with "as if.." of the below paragraph in
> > MobileIPv6-13,
> > because
> >
> > [1] Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 spec does not state that kind of
> > statement and
> > [2] the MN's BU condition (#) seems to be outof accord with
> > (*), perhaps
> > from the view point of implementation.
> >
> > comment please.
> >
> > Jiwoong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    For packets received by either the first or last of these three
> >    methods, the mobile node SHOULD send a Binding Update to
> > the original
> >    sender of the packet, as described in Section 10.8, subject to the
> >    rate limiting defined in Section 10.11.  The mobile node SHOULD
> >    also process the received packet in the manner defined for IPv6
> >    encapsulation [4], which will result in the encapsulated (inner)
> >    packet being processed normally by upper-layer protocols within the
> >    mobile node, (*)as if it had been addressed (only) to the
> > mobile node's
> >    home address.
> >
> > and
> >
> >    In addition, when a mobile node receives a packet for which the
> >    mobile node can deduce that the original sender of the packet has
> >    no Binding Cache entry for the mobile node, or for which the mobile
> >    node can deduce that the original sender of the packet has an
> >    out-of-date care-of address for the mobile node in its
> > Binding Cache,
> >    the mobile node SHOULD return a Binding Update to the sender giving
> >    its current care-of address (subject to the rate limiting defined
> >    in Section 10.11).  In particular, the mobile node SHOULD return a
> >    Binding Update in response to receiving a packet that meets all of
> >    the following tests:
> >
> > (#)   -  The packet was tunneled using IPv6 encapsulation.
> >     ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jiwoong Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:44 AM
> > Subject: [mobile-ip] MN's packet reception
> >
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Becasue CN's requirement to use Binding Cache when it sends
> > > a packet to MN is "SHOULD", the corresponding possibilities
> > > in which a MN receives a packet while away from home also
> > > should be described legitimately.
> > >
> > > A MN MAY receive a packet
> > > addressed to its home address, which is sent by a CN that DOES
> > > have a Binding Cache entry for the MN, if the CN does NOT like
> > > to use Routing Header.
> > >
> > > Jiwoong
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > 8.9. Sending Packets to a Mobile Node
> > >
> > >    Before sending any packet, the sending node SHOULD examine its
> > >    Binding Cache for an entry for the destination address
> > to which the
> > >    packet is being sent.  If the sending node has a Binding
> > Cache entry
> > >    for this address, the sending node SHOULD use a Routing header to
> > >    route the packet to this mobile node (the destination
> > node) by way
> > >    of the care-of address in the binding recorded in that
> > Binding Cache
> > >    entry. ...
> > >
> > >
> > > 10.3. Receiving Packets While Away from Home
> > >
> > >    While away from home, a mobile node will receive packets
> > addressed to
> > >    its home address, by one of three methods:
> > >
> > >     -  Packets sent by a correspondent node that does not have a
> > >        Binding Cache entry for the mobile node, will be sent by the
> > >        correspondent node in the same way as any normal IP
> > packet.  Such
> > >        packets will then be intercepted by the mobile
> > node's home agent,
> > >        encapsulated using IPv6 encapsulation [4], and
> > tunneled to the
> > >        mobile node's primary care-of address. ...
> >
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to