Julian,

When this idea was suggested at the Interim Meeting, several people
expressed concern about needing to have a link-local address for every
interface identifier you might be using.  A node may want to have a
large number of global addresses, for example, and the overhead of
requiring that it keep a corresponding link-local address for each might
be prohibitive.  I think I'd prefer to just perfom DAD on all the global
addresses instead.  It's the same amount of DADing going on, and you
don't need to keep all those link-local addresses around.

--Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellers, Julian P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2001 14:04
> To: 'Thomas Narten'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: DAD 
> 
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> Is there a problem with requiring nodes to perform DAD on the 
> link-local address generated from a given interface 
> identifier, even if they only want to use the site-local or 
> the global address?  That's what I thought the following 
> sentences from 5.4 of RFC 2462 required:
> 
>         Thus, for a set of addresses formed from the same
>         interface identifier, it is sufficient to check that the link-
>         local address generated from the identifier is unique on the
>         link. In such cases, the link-local address MUST be tested for
>         uniqueness, and if no duplicate address is detected, an
>         implementation MAY choose to skip Duplicate Address Detection
>         for additional addresses derived from the same interface
>         identifier.
> 
> It's not clear to me what the qualifier "In such cases" 
> refers to.  Maybe this paragraph just needs to state clearly that
> 
>      - If a node has successfully performed DAD on a 
> link-local address, the node has the
>        right to all addresses on the same link that contain 
> the same interface identifier.
>      - If a node has not performed DAD on the link-local 
> address, or if the link-local
>        address has failed DAD, the node must not use any 
> address on that link generated with
>        the same interface identifier.
> 
> Julian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to