>>>>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:44:47 +0300,
>>>>> Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In the meeting there was a question of whether to prefer
> a) 4 bit scope + 28 index
> b) 32 index (get scope from somewhere else)
> for sockaddr_in6 sin6 scope id. I've a slight preference for case (a).
> This seems to be an API issue, but even if EPOC API is different from
> the Unix socket API, it will be nice if the concepts have 1:1
> mapping (porting applications becomes easier).
So, let's discuss this in the API folks mailing list. I'll summarize
my opinion and post it to the list in a few days.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
