>>>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:19:14 -0700 (PDT),
>>>>> Tim Hartrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > I was pretty sure that I and others made some proposals during the last
>> > discussion of this topic that were close to working for at least the receiving
>> > and sending of ancillary data. It has been a while but I am sure we started
>> > down the path of a solution. I guess I can try and dredge the discussion
>> > out of the archives.
>>
>> Okay, then I'll wait for the archive.
> Rather than repost a lot of messages from the archive I will simply give you
> a pointer into the archive where you can find the discussion.
> I believe that the core of the last discussion on this topic began with
> a message by Francis Dupont on December 15, 2000. The subject of that
> message was "destination option update". In the discussion that followed
> there was the beginnings of a design to solve the problem, I hope.
> If so we can just jump right into the middle of that six month old
> discussion and finish off this issue.
Thanks for the pointer. I'll reread the past discussion from the list
archive, and will continue the discussion later.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
