Hi,
Referring to the above RFC(2374);
The aim of Aggregatable addressing is to simplify routing compared to
current CIDR, at each level. Does it dictates, that routers at each level
will have entries only for the specified prefixes? For example, long-haul
providers backbone router has entries of only /16 prefix route entries and
NLA1 router's will have /48 prefix entry, etc. Or mix of different prefix
sizes are allowed to be added at the routing table regardless of it's level!
What about 'host-route' advertisement?
thank you.
-ettikan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
