In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 02 Jul 2001 20:09:01 +0900),
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Please note that the text below is not the conclusion, but just a
> > memo. I'd like to hear from others about the issues on this list
> > based on the memo, discuss further if necessary, and try to get a
> > consensus hopefully in a week or so. Then the result will (probably)
> > be in the next revision of the scope architecture draft.
>
> Hmm, only a few people have stated preference on this issue. I don't
> think I've seen enough votes to make a decision, but we have to fix
> this soon. I'm still waiting for opinions for a while, so please
> speak up if anyone of you is interested in this topic.
I prefer 32bit scope, not 4+28. I do not want to have two
"scope-fields." in a single sockaddr{}.
--yoshfuji
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
