Hi Dario,
I think these questions haven't been answered yet.. so I'll take
my stab at it..
Dario Accornero wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple of questions about the latest revision (12th July)
> of draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2011-update-00.txt :
>
> 1. ipIfStatsTable:
> Why {In,Out}Octets and {In,Out}McastOctets are declared as
> Counter32 instead of as Counter64 ?
64 bit equivalents of all these objects exist i.e.
ipIfStatsInOctets (32 bit) <===> ipIfStatsHCInOctets (64 bit)
ipIfStatsOutOctets <===> ipIfStatsHCOutOctets
ipIfStatsInMcastOctets <===> ipIfStatsHCInMcastOctets
ipIfStatsOutMcastOctets <===> ipIfStatsHCOutMcastOctets
> 2. ipIfStatsTable:
> Why there are no accurate descriptions of the new counters,
> besides {In,Out}Octets ?
The description of all the 64 bit objects are same as the 32 bit
version.. the only change is that they maintain 64-bit values
instead of 32-bit.
HTH..
-Rajiv.
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Dario Accornero - IOS Europe Development - IPv6 Team
> Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK - voice +44 20 8756 6268
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
