Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation

[David Terrell]

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:41:13AM -0700, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Of course, the other serious problem with your argument is that your
> one-month assumption is wrong. It is _not_ acceptable for information to
> persist for a month. I addressed this in my previous message, and in my
> ``Extremely long TTLs'' message six months ago. I'm not sure why you've
> waited six months to state your disagreement.

Did I miss somewhere where the expiration of the cryptographic
signature was defined to replace the normal DNS TTL on the record?

-- 
David Terrell            | "My question is, if a mime types, isn't 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             |  that kinda cheating?"
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/  |    - Jason Zych
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------