>A quick comment on this draft - as somewhat of a ANYCAST novice,
>I found this informative. However, I was wondering if a section
>on SCTP might be useful. I would be willing to contribute
>some text on this - but probably not until after the London
>meeting.
>
>SCTP has some very interesting features that, on one hand
>may complicate the use of ANYCAST, but also make the use
>of ANYCAST very attractive. I have been thinking quite much
>about some uses for this.
>
>Since SCTP allows each endpoint to use multiple IP addresses,
>this might make it easier to send to an ANYCAST address,
>while allowing a reply from a UNICAST address.
yes, SCTP section would be nice to have. or, should i generalize
L4 sections? not sure. anyway, i agree we should say something
about it.
>If you are willing, we could discuss this in London.
of course, i'll be in all of the IPv6 meetings, and i'll be in
term room all night:-) so it should be quite easy for us to meet up.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
