>>>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:28:03 +0700,
>>>>> Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> | You could say that, but I believe B and C should be separate.
> This is an irrelevant point (the whole question of majorities),
> but it doesn't matter whether they're separate or not, a majority
> is still more than 50% of the total, not just the greatest number
> of any of the possibilities.
Okay, please just read the text "relatively large number of people (or
whatever you want).
> | Hmm, I guess it would be okay to leave it as implementation dependent,
> | that is, "we adopt the flat 32 model, but the actual mapping from a
> | particular zone to a zone ID (sin6_scope_id) is implementation
> | dependent." Does this make sense to you?
> Yes, I have no problem with that. But again, I don't know enough about
> the implications for my opinion on this to count for anything...
I see, I won't count you as a support of A.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
