Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the story applies only if we are going to move to A6 + AAAA synthesis.
> if we don't migrate, we have no worry and everyone is happy.
I'm not!
Johan
PS. Sorry about that, but I simply could not resist that response in
the grand tradition of the british Monty Python-comedians... now back
to our regular programme of intense disagreements ;-)
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 15 08:20:40 2001
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88])
by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.11.5+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7FFKdg223358
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.5+Sun/8.11.5) id f7FFKc213615;
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [bert hubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Content-Length: 2406
Status: RO
X-Status: $$$$
X-UID: 0000000047
>From owner-ipng Wed Aug 15 08:20:34 2001
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6])
by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.5+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7FFKXD13608
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saturn.sun.com (saturn.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.2])
by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA12112
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fork.powerdns.com (fork.powerdns.com [213.244.168.244])
by saturn.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA00835
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3129 invoked by uid 1011); 15 Aug 2001 15:20:26 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:20:26 +0200
From: bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed,
Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> | Then the Internet is doomed. Either evolution or revolution.
>
> In some places, revolution is all that is possible. The evolutionary
> step is just too big to every take.
I'm butting in here, but it may be interesting to know that quite a number
of the top-100 resolving nameserver installations out there are still
running Bind4! I'm doing some research on the big resolvers out there,
especially the (non-)randomness of the id field.
Some of these people have gone through great lengths to remain at Bind4,
even though they run late breaking operating system releases.
Regards,
bert hubert
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
