Hello folks,
Has there been any further determination about where the
AAAv6 work should proceed? It seems to me that it does
fit within the AAA working group now. If an URP working
group is created in the future, and they want to have the
work item, a transfer could be discussed at that time.
In the meantime, we could start to have more discussion
about particulars.
Regards,
Charlie P.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> RE: AAAv6 draft
>
> > Has this draft been presented within the IPNG WG? Since IPv6
> > architecture occurs within IPNG WG, the proposed IPv6/AAA
> > authentication architecture would need to be presented and
> > gain consensus within the IPNG WG before a AAA WG work item
> > could be considered.
>
> Charlie Perkins presented the AAAv6 draft he has been writing
> to the IPNG WG. There seemed to be general consensus that
> this was good work (in general) and be persued. It seemed to
> the group that IPNG WG was not the best place for this, but
> the AAA could be one possibility. Erik Nordmark also suggested
> that URP could be another home.
>
> Of course, if I have mis-interpreted the consensus, I' sure
> someone (Steve?) could correct me.
>
> I'm in favor of this going forward. I think that no official
> decision has been made on URP (whether or not it is to be a
> WG) - perhaps the Area Directors & Work Group chairs could
> discuss where the best place for this work is.
>
> best regards,
> John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
