Thomas Narten wrote:
...
> In my view, deciding on the right useage of the bits requires first
> understanding the problem that needs to be solved.

I think that from the QOS viewpoint, we do understand the problem very well, 
hence the proposal to add a diffserv usage to the existing intserv usage.

The intserv usage is documented and somewhat implemented, and I don't
think we can hide behind the weasel words in RFC 2460 any longer. 

I don't pretend to understand the routing handle usage (but then,
I'm of the school of thought that doesn't understand why anyone would
want MPLS either).

  Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to