On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:41:37PM +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> >> There are two kind of "anycast" proposed and operated for IPv4 - One is
> >> RFC1546 [Partridge, 1993] anycast. Another is what we call "BGP anycast"
> >> in this document; this is for replicating unicast servers by BGP trick.
> >> We concentrate into the former in this document.
> >as it is used for dns etc. *within* a single provider, it can be an igp
> >which is used, not bgp.
>
> i see, but are there such practice exist? how do they cope
> with server failures and IGP flaps?
Same problem as for BGP anycast, I guess.
Regards,
-is
PGP signature
