Hi,

The idea of carrying MPLS labels in IPv6 packet destination options is
already patented by us in 3Com.
We also compiled a ietf-draft in June, but delayed to send out. 
Attached below is the draft.

Thanks,
        -rajesh


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:14 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-roesler-ipngwg-ipngls-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.


        Title           : IPNGLS - IP Next Generation Label Switching
        Author(s)       : V. Roesler et al.
        Filename        : draft-roesler-ipngwg-ipngls-00.txt
        Pages           : 17
        Date            : 29-Aug-01
        
This document proposes the forwarding of IPv6 packets using label
switching techniques, with the same advantages of the Multiprotocol
Label Switching (MPLS) architecture. The document proposes the
mapping of all MPLS header fields into the IPv6 header, raising
several advantages like the simplicity of the model, the decrease of
overhead, and others. This mapping was called IP Next Generation
Label Switching, or just IPngLS, and can work concurrently with
MPLS, i.e. IPv6 packets are forwarded with IPngLS and IPv4 packets
are forwarded with MPLS.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-roesler-ipngwg-ipngls-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username
"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in,
type "cd internet-drafts" and then
        "get draft-roesler-ipngwg-ipngls-00.txt".

A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt


Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.

Send a message to:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body type:
        "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-roesler-ipngwg-ipngls-00.txt".
        
NOTE:   The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
        MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
        feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
        command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
        a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
        exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
        "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
        up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
        how to manipulate these messages.
                
                
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.



Network Working Group                              Shaji Radhakrishnan 
Internet Draft                                     Watercove Networks 
June, 2001                                         Satish Amara 
                                                   3COM corporation      
                                                   Rajesh Ramankutty 
                                                   YingChun Xu 
                                                   Ellis Wong 
                                                   WaterCove Networks 
                 
 
 
                 MPLS label stack encapsulation in Ipv6 
                 <draft-mpls-label-encaps-ipv6-00.txt>  
 
 
    
Status of this Memo 
 
   This document is an Internet Draft and is in full conformance with 
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet Drafts are working 
   documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, 
   and working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute 
   working documents as Internet Drafts. 
    
   Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six 
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsolete by other documents 
   at anytime. It is inappropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference 
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 
    
   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
        http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 
    
   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
        http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 
    
    
Abstract 
    
   In certain cases it may be useful to encapsulate MPLS packets in 
   IPV6 packets. This document describes a method to encapsulate MPLS 
   in IPV6 networks.  
    
1. Encapsulation in IPv6 
    
   The  IPv6  destination  option  or  Flow-field  will  be  used  to 
   encapsulate the MPLS label. The LDP on the Egress router and LDP on 
   the ingress router will agree on what label to use and this label is 
   encapsulated in the IPV6 flow label.  Presently, there are two 
   mechanisms for LDP peers discovery namely basic discovery and 
   extended discovery. Basic discovery is used to discover LDP peers, 
   which are directly connected. Extended discovery is used to discover 
   LDP peers, which are not directly connected. This mechanism will be 
   used to establish peering relationship between the LDP running on 
   Egress and Ingress routers. A new option in the LDP message is 
  
Radhakrishnan, Amara et.al &Expires Nov. 2001                        1 

                < draft-mpls-label-encaps-ipv6-00.txt>   November 2001 
 
 
   introduced to convey that extended label is encapsulated in IPV6 
   destination option or flow-field. Once the label is distributed by 
   the LDP on egress router to the LDP on Ingress router, then the 
   egress router will label the packet. The forwarding decision at 
   Ingress router will be based on destination option or flow-field in 
   IPV6 packet. If the egress node sets the flow-id field to zero 
   (i.e., the flow-id is not used for anything else like QoS), then the 
   flow-id can be used to encapsulate the top field in label stack. If 
   the flow-id is used to set QoS fields, then the destination 
   extension header options are used to carry the label or label stack. 
    
   If only one label is present in the label stack, the best way is to 
   use the flow-id for carrying the label, if the flow-id is not used 
   for  any  other  purpose.  But  another  argument  to  simplify  the 
   processing at both egress as well as ingress nodes, the extension 
   header is only used to specify the label stack. With this, the 
   egress node always use Ipv6 extension header to place the label 
   stack (whether label stack contains single or multiple labels) and 
   the ingress node always looks for label extension header to check 
   label stack. 
 
2. MPLS label stack transport in Ipv6 Extension header 
 
 
   The format of destination option header is the following. 
    
 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
   | Next Header | Hdr Ext Len |                        | 
   |-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                             + 
   |                                                               | 
   .                                                               . 
   .                    Options                         . 
   .                                                               . 
   |                                                               | 
   |-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
 
   The options are in TLV format as follows. 
    
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - - -  
   | Option Type | Opt Data Len | Option Data  
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- - - - - - - - -  
    
   Option Type :: 8-bit identifier of the type of option. The proposed 
   value is 2 for the MPLS label stack. 
    
   Opt Data Len :: 8-bit unsigned integer. Length of the Option Data 
   field of this option, in octets. The length of each label is 32 bits 
   which 4 bytes, i.e. 20bit label, 1 bit for label stack, 3 bits for 
   experimental bits and 8 bit for TTL. I.e. if the label stack 
   contains 3 labels, the size will be 12 bytes. 
    
    
  
Radhakrishnan & Amara et. Al, Expires Nov. 2001                      2 

                < draft-mpls-label-encaps-ipv6-00.txt>   November 2001 
 
 
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Label 
         |                Label                  | Exp |S|       TTL     |  
         +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
    
             Label:  Label Value, 20 bits 
             Exp:    Experimental Use, 3 bits 
             S:      Bottom of Stack, 1 bit 
             TTL:    Time To Live field, 8bits 
    
    
   Option Data :: Variable-length field. Option-Type-specific data. The 
   data contains the encoded MPLS  label stack. When placing the label 
   stack, the label in the top of the stack  as the first label, the 
   next one in the stack will be the second label etc.. 
 
     
      <MPLS  +----+        +----+        +----+        +----+ <MPLS 
       ------| IP |--------| IP |--------| IP |--------| IP |----- 
      Cloud> +----+        +----+        +----+        +----+   Cloud> 
            Egress |<------------IPV6Cloud------------>|Ingress 
             LSR                                        LSR 
   
 
 
3. Label processing at egress node 
    
   The outgoing packet will be a normal Ipv6 packet. If the flow-id is 
   set to zero, then the outgoing label is placed in the flow-id of the 
   Ipv6 packet. If there is a label stack, each label is placed in the 
   destination  header  options  in  order  as  described  above.  The 
   destination of this Ipv6 packet will be the ingress MPLS router, 
   which support Ipv6 on the ingress interface. A field in destination 
   option specifies that the top label (in label stack) is encapsulated 
   in flow-id. 
    
   The TTL field from the label is copied to the Hop Limit field in the 
   Ipv6 header of the tunneled packet. In the ingress node, the Hop 
   Limit filed value is copied back to the TTL field of the label. 
 
4. Label processing at ingress node 
    
   The ingress node looks for incoming Ipv6 packet and gets the 
   incoming flow label from the flow-Id of the Ipv6 packets for the 
   NHFLE entry. The ingress node also looks for any destination header 
   options for MPLS label stack. If any label stack is present, each 
   label from the destination option is taken in the order. The first 
   label should be the top of the stack, the second label will be the 
   second one from the top etc.. The label and stack processing are 
   done as described in the MPLS architecture. 
    
   In certain cases (i.e., when security is not applied to the original 
   packet end-to-end) instead of tunneling MPLS packet in IPV6 packets 
   by the egress node, the packets can be transported in IPV6 packets 
  
Radhakrishnan & Amara et. Al, Expires Nov. 2001                      3 

                < draft-mpls-label-encaps-ipv6-00.txt>   November 2001 
 
 
   using routing header option. In that case the routing header would 
   specify the route. Routing header will contain two entries. The 
   first hop in the routing header will be Ingress router and the final 
   hop will be destination IP address of the packet.  
 
5. Security Considerations 
    
   Security issues are not discussed in this document.  
 
6. References 
    
    
   [1] E. Rosen et.al �MPLS Label Stack Encoding�.  
        RFC3032, January 2001. 
    
   [2] E. Rosen et.al �Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture�. 
        RFC3031 
   [3] L. Andersson et al, "LDP Specification,"  
       Internet-RFC 3036, Jan 2001. 
  
   [4] Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Internet-RFC 2460 
    
   [5]  J. Reynolds and J. Postel. "ASSIGNED NUMBERS". RFC1700, October 
        1994. 
 
    
Author's Addresses 
    
     Shaji Radhakrishnan 
     WaterCove Networks  
     1750 East Golf Road, Suite 550 
     Schaumburg, IL 60173        
     Phone: (847) 621-8913       
     Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
     Satish Amara 
     3Com Corporation  
     3800, Golf Road, 
     Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 
     Phone: 847-262-2563 
     Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
    
     Rajesh Ramankutty 
     3Com Corporation 
     3800, Golf Road, 
     Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 
     Phone: 847-262-2580 
     Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
     Yingchun Xu 
     WaterCove Networks  

  
Radhakrishnan & Amara et. Al, Expires Nov. 2001                      4 

                < draft-mpls-label-encaps-ipv6-00.txt>   November 2001 
 
 
     1750 East Golf Road, Suite 550 
     Schaumburg, IL - 60173      
     Phone: (847) 477-9280       
     Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
    
     Ellis Wong 
     WaterCove Networks  
     285 Billerica Road 
     Chelmsford, MA - 01824      
     Phone: (978) 608-2089       
     Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    
    







































  
Radhakrishnan & Amara et. Al, Expires Nov. 2001                      5 


Reply via email to