Bob, Steve, I think that the -06 document still does not address the comment I sent to the mailing list right after London IETF.
>2. The current draft does longest prefix match on 128 bits. > In the case of a dual-rail network where each hosts has > 2 interfaces > > prefix P1/64 > ------------------------------------------------------ > | h1 | h2 |h3 > ------------------------------------------------------ > prefix P2/64 > > In this case, the choice of network 1 or network 2 depend > on the actual MAC address of the hosts. > This is a situation that is very difficult to understand/debug > by network administrator. > > I would like to suggest to do longest prefix match only on the 64 > most significant bits. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
