> The physical relocation might me relatively minor. > For instance, large corporations might choose to define one place > (e.g. one building on one of many campuses) as the coordinates as the > single place that defines the IP address prefix for the whole company > yet that building might house much less than 1% of the company's IP devices > and people. > > This means that giving up the lease on that single building will cause all > IP devices to renumber yet the costs due to the physical relocation are > small.
seems like a stretch. as long as the company retained some network presence in that area it should be able to keep that prefix. though if the company decided to completely shut down its operations at that area (not an entirely unusual occurance) it could indeed require the entire company to reunumber. having your entire company under a single prefix might turn out to be bad planning in an IPv6 world. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
