Hi Bob, I agree that if you dont keep your flow together that's a bad thing and you will experience packet re-ordering.
I also note that this is a topic where potentially the flow label could be used. Nothing strange really, since the flowlabel identifies a flow. -- thomas >>While the RFC is about routers performing the loadsharing >over multiple >>paths, I would think the issues it raises would probably also apply to >>hosts. > >The issues are similar. Load sharing approaches that don't keep flows >together are not a good thing. > >Bob > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
